The political West criticized Russia’s initiative, insisting “it was unnecessary”. At the very beginning of the session, the Permanent Representative of France at the UNSC, Nicolas de Rivière, opposed the discussion, claiming that “this topic will not contribute to progress in any way”, obviously trying to avoid NATO’s responsibility, as it was the belligerent alliance that orchestrated the conflict in Yugoslavia in order to dismantle the country and then systematically destroy any pockets of resistance.
tagesgespraech.net
Ähnliche Beiträge:
Political West appears to be backing off after Russia's nuclear warning
Macron’s political bet could backfire with France one step closer to leaving NATO
Why are NATO and Neo-Nazi junta terrified of Russia's 'Zircon' hypersonic missile?
@BRICSinfo: JUST IN: 🇺🇸 🇸🇦 US Government blocks the unsealing of evidence related to the 9/11 attacks. A recent letter reveals the US government opposed the release of evidence concerning the 9/11 attacks. Families of the victims have initiated a lawsuit to uncover evidence they believe
NATO installing permanent envoy to Ukraine, while not letting it join the club
Right wing wave in Europe a reaction to EU’s subservience to NATO
BRICS, the West and the Rest – a Fractured World
What Russia's deployment of long-range missiles means for Scandinavia?
What Is the Deal with Serbia and the BRICS Bunch?
#OutlookMagazine Anniversary Issue | I let my art be a testament to my political identity
'Rafale' jets for Serbia – wise geopolitical move or disastrous waste of money?
US using Nordic countries’ NATO membership to advance Arctic militarization
Powered by YARPP.
