The Russian military would almost certainly not send millions of soldiers to take territory in Poland or other NATO countries, but would launch hundreds of long-range cruise, ballistic and hypersonic missiles at targets it deems militarily important, setting back their economies by decades. No sane leader of an independent (or at least partially independent) country would want that. And Europe doesn’t really have a way of responding without escalating the conflict into a thermonuclear exchange, one that it would most certainly lose, as it can’t even maintain its strategic arsenal in peacetime.
tagesgespraech.net
Ähnliche Beiträge:
Singapore inadvertently reveals more about direct US involvement in Ukraine
Up to half a million NATO soldiers waiting to enter Ukraine
Biden makes it clear Ukraine will not be a NATO member
NATO flirts with no-fly zones over Ukraine, Russia responds with hypersonic strikes
Russian EW nullifies accuracy of NATO precision-guided munitions in Ukraine
German general warns of “fatal error” NATO will make if proxy war in Ukraine continues
NATO soldiers already in Ukraine
Ukraine may have to compromise with Russia, says NATO chief Stoltenberg
EU increases military aid fund for Ukraine to €5 billion amid ‘desperation’ for ammunition
@BRICSinfo: JUST IN: 🇮🇷 🇮🇱 Iran threatens an "obliterating war" if Israel attacks Lebanon. "Should it embark on full-scale military aggression, an obliterating war will ensue. All options, including the full involvement of all Resistance Fronts, are on the table."
Sending NATO soldiers to Ukraine is “apocalypse warning,” says Slovak prime minister
UK brags about direct involvement in attacking Russian Navy ships
Powered by YARPP.
